Argentina’s 20th-century history mirrors challenges seen in nations where governments often justify low living standards with claims of a “special path.” This article explores the Argentine paradox—a case study in economic decline, where a once-prosperous nation spiraled into stagnation, hyperinflation, and political instability. From its peak as the world’s richest country per capita in 1895 to its struggles with 19-digit inflation, Argentina’s story offers lessons in ambition, mismanagement, and resilience. Today, under Javier Miley, a libertarian president wielding a symbolic chainsaw, the country faces a bold new chapter.
Formed in 1861 after a civil war, the Republic of Argentina emerged from the United Provinces of South America, gaining independence in 1810. The government prioritized agriculture, attracting labor and foreign investment, especially from the United Kingdom. With minimal interference, Argentina doubled its territory southward, leveraging technical progress to export wheat, meat, and wool globally. British investments fueled railway and agricultural infrastructure, positioning Argentina as a future world power.
By 1895, Argentina boasted a GDP per capita of $5,786—higher than the U.S., UK, France, Switzerland, or Germany. British capital, second only to India, drove economic growth averaging 6% annually for 50 years pre-World War I—an unmatched global record. Migrants, heavily subsidized, swelled the workforce, though large landowners dominated, leaving laborers underpaid. Cities like Buenos Aires boomed, with a metro opening in 1913. By 1914, half of Buenos Aires’ residents were newcomers, and universal voting solidified democratic foundations.
Despite prosperity, cracks appeared. Slums grew as migrants faced unemployment in underdeveloped industries. A negative trade balance, fueled by imported equipment, ballooned the national debt. In 1890, Argentina defaulted, devastating British investors who held 40–50% of its foreign investments. Growth slowed, and foreign capital dried up for 15 years, though agriculture—boosted by refrigeration technology—sustained exports like frozen meat.
Neutrality during WWI slashed foreign investment, while the 1914 Panama Canal rerouted trade, diminishing southern ports. Agricultural exports plummeted, sparking strikes—like the 1919 Vasena clash, where 700 died amid Bolshevik-inspired unrest. The Great Depression of 1929 further crippled exports, as protectionism from the U.S. and UK tanked demand. Unemployment soared, and inflation eroded stability in Argentine economic history.
A 1943 military coup birthed Peronism, led by Colonel Juan Domingo Perón. Inspired by Mussolini, Perón championed workers, becoming labor minister and vice president. His charisma and pro-union policies—like social housing and wage hikes—won widespread support. After a brief 1945 imprisonment, mass protests reinstated him, and in 1946, he won the presidency. His “third way”—blending capitalism and socialism—nationalized industries, ballooning state enterprises from 11% to 35% in seven years.
Perón’s wife, Eva “Evita” Perón, amplified his appeal. As labor and health minister, she funneled a social fund—financed by worker deductions—to the poor, cementing her status as a populist icon. Her radio broadcasts fueled Peronism’s cult of personality, though reckless spending and nationalization strained finances. Inflation hit 19% annually by 1949, and trade deficits emerged as European demand waned.
After Evita’s 1952 death, economic woes mounted. Perón’s push to canonize her sparked Vatican backlash, culminating in his 1955 ousting by a military coup. Exiled, he left behind a fractured nation and personal wealth confiscated by the state.
Post-Perón, military juntas ruled, notably during the 1976–1983 Dirty War, where 10,000 died and 30,000 vanished. The junta’s “shock therapy”—inspired by the Chicago School—slashed tariffs and privatized land, but inflation soared. The 1982 Falklands War against Britain, meant to rally support, ended in defeat, deepening national trauma.
Raúl Alfonsín’s 1983 election inherited 672% hyperinflation and a $45 billion debt. His Austral Plan briefly curbed inflation to 90%, but without growth reforms, it fizzled, yielding 200% hyperinflation under the Primavera Plan. Carlos Menem’s 1990s reforms tied the peso to the dollar, stabilizing the economy until the 1997 Asian crisis and 1998 Russian default triggered a 2001 collapse—Argentina’s largest default at the time.
By 2023, Argentina faced 148% inflation, a 97% key rate, and 45% poverty. Nine defaults in Argentine economic history since 2001, including 2014 and 2020, eroded trust. Yet, its resources—oil, shale gas, lithium, and fertile lands—hint at untapped potential.
In 2023, Javier Miley, a libertarian economist, won with 56% of votes, promising to dismantle Argentina’s “repressive state system.” His December 2023 decree slashed ministries to nine, fired recent civil servants, and aimed to privatize state firms, end price controls, and dollarize the economy. Facing trade union backlash and lacking parliamentary majorities, Miley leverages emergency decrees to push reforms, warning of short-term hardship for long-term gain.
Argentina’s history oscillates between brilliance and collapse. Miley’s libertarian vision—free markets, minimal state intervention—could tap agribusiness, energy, and tech startups (South America’s unicorn leader). Success hinges on execution amidst social unrest and economic fragility.
Argentina’s journey from riches to rags reflects the perils of isolationism, populism, and mismanagement. Whether Miley’s radical reforms reverse this “economic curse” remains uncertain. For now, Argentina stands at a crossroads, its potential as vast as its challenges.
Explore relocation options to Argentina with Immi.Legal.